New on the Anthropic Engineering Blog: Demystifying evals for AI agents. The capabilities that make agents useful also make them more difficult to evaluate. Here are evaluation strategies that have worked across real-world deployments. https://t.co/UD0yGglTU0
Anthropic Publishes AI Agent Evaluation Framework from Production Deployments
Anthropic· Updated
Anthropic's engineering team published a guide to evaluating AI agents across coding, conversational, research, and computer use categories. The guide draws from Claude Code development and collaborations with Descript, Bolt, Stripe, and Shopify to provide a practical eval-building roadmap.
The guide draws from Claude Code development and collaborations with Descript, Bolt, Stripe, and Shopify. Descript built evals around three dimensions: don't break things, do what was asked, do it well. Bolt built their system in three months using static analysis, browser agents, and LLM judges.
Five frameworks reviewed: Harbor, Promptfoo (used internally at Anthropic), Braintrust, LangSmith, and Langfuse. Start by sourcing tasks from real agent failures.
Every HeadsUpAI update is written based on its original source and reviewed before it's published. Read our editorial standards →
